By Man Shall His Blood Be Shed Review

• Domicile
• My Books

Open Preview

See a Problem?

Nosotros'd love your help. Let us know what's wrong with this preview of By Man Shall His Claret Be Shed by Edward Feser.

Thanks for telling us almost the problem.

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign upward.

Reader Q&A

Be the outset to enquire a question about By Man Shall His Claret Be Shed

Community Reviews

 · 51 ratings  · seven reviews

Start your review of By Human being Shall His Blood Be Shed: A Catholic Defense of Capital punishment

Very thorough. I have non researched this topic to form an opinion and went off the statements from the USCCB. I am glad to have heard about this book. Feser has compelling arguments for capital punishment and I appreciate his hard work in putting this volume together. I would say that my stance on capital punishment is to not cancel it so that justice tin exist served in cases where the death penalty is merited.

You cannot throw the death penalty argument in with abortion. Abortion is a moral e

Very thorough. I have not researched this topic to course an opinion and went off the statements from the USCCB. I am glad to have heard nigh this book. Feser has compelling arguments for capital punishment and I appreciate his hard work in putting this book together. I would say that my opinion on death penalty is to not cancel it so that justice tin can be served in cases where the capital punishment is merited.

You cannot throw the capital penalty statement in with abortion. Ballgame is a moral evil that takes away the right to life. With death sentence, if a person is bedevilled of a crime worthy of the decease penalty because they took a life, so the death penalty holds homo dignity for the victim, their family and the person who committed the crime.

...more than

Jun 28, 2021 booklady marked it as to-read

'It'south truthful that contempo popes accept questioned the wisdom of using the death penalisation. Pope Francis has fifty-fifty altered the Catechism to read that "the death penalization is inadmissible considering it is an set on on the inviolability and nobility of the person." (CCC 2267) But this is his personal view. In the Onetime Testament, God Himself prescribes death for certain crimes. And a long series of the pope's predecessors would take argued the opposite: holding people responsible for grave acts is, in a way, an af 'It's truthful that recent popes have questioned the wisdom of using the death punishment. Pope Francis has fifty-fifty contradistinct the Canon to read that "the death sentence is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and nobility of the person." (CCC 2267) But this is his personal view. In the Quondam Testament, God Himself prescribes death for certain crimes. And a long serial of the pope'south predecessors would accept argued the reverse: holding people responsible for grave acts is, in a way, an affirmation of their human nobility as moral actors.' -From A Piffling Clarity on Some Big Questions, an commodity past Robert Royal of "The Cosmic Thing". ...more than

January 30, 2022 Gabriel Syme rated it really liked it

I liked the first two chapters, primarily written by Edward Feser, much more than the last two chapters, primarily written by Joseph Bessette. Once you lot've established, as Feser does, that upper-case letter punishment is philosophically defendable and supported by Scripture and Tradition, the analysis of the data washed past Bessette (touching on questions similar "is uppercase penalty being applied in discriminatory ways," "are large numbers of innocent people beingness executed," etc), seems less interesting. Past n I liked the start two capacity, primarily written by Edward Feser, much more than the final two chapters, primarily written by Joseph Bessette. One time you lot've established, every bit Feser does, that capital letter penalisation is philosophically defendable and supported by Scripture and Tradition, the analysis of the data done by Bessette (touching on questions like "is capital punishment being applied in discriminatory ways," "are large numbers of innocent people beingness executed," etc), seems less interesting. By no means unimportant, though. ...more

The authors (Edward Feser and Joseph Grand. Bessette) brand many valuable points: Catholics are non required to favor the abolitionism of the death penalty; the Church has consistently taught that death sentence is legitimate in principle; many arguments against the decease penalty are weak, ill-founded, or even downright stupid; a large measure of prudential judgment, not subject to administrative pronouncements by the Church, is involved in the decision whether the death penalisation should or should non The authors (Edward Feser and Joseph Grand. Bessette) make many valuable points: Catholics are non required to favor the abolition of the capital punishment; the Church building has consistently taught that death penalty is legitimate in principle; many arguments against the capital punishment are weak, sick-founded, or even downright stupid; a large measure of prudential judgment, non discipline to administrative pronouncements past the Church, is involved in the decision whether the death penalty should or should non be applied in particular cases. They convincingly argue that absolute opposition to the death penalty is neither wise nor beneficial. Pope Francis and the American bishops would benefit from considering the best of these authors' arguments, if they wished to practice so.

If but the authors had stopped afterward presenting merely their all-time arguments. Alas, they didn't. Many arguments in favor of the death penalty are too weak, ill-founded, or even downright stupid, and these authors don't omit them; instead, they present them at length. A basic presupposition of their less satisfactory arguments appears to be that some crimes are then bad that "no penalty less than death" amounts to proportionate retribution. Had they simply said some crimes are so bad that "even expiry is not too severe a penalisation," they would have stiff support from Catholic teaching including that of St. Thomas Aquinas, who allegedly supports their position. Merely they fail to acknowledge that, co-ordinate to St. Thomas, proportionate retribution sets just a maximum--not a necessary minimum--of deserved punishment. Indeed, this is precisely why justice is consequent with mercy according to St. Thomas [Southward.T. I, Q. 21, A. three ad 2 & A. 4 ad ane]: "God acts mercifully, non indeed by going against His justice, but by doing something more than justice; thus a man who pays another two hundred pieces of money, though owing him merely one hundred, does nothing against justice, simply acts liberally or mercifully. The case is the same with one who pardons an offence committed against him, for in remitting it he may exist said to bequeath a gift. . . . Even in the damnation of the reprobate mercy is seen, which, though it does not totally remit, even so somewhat alleviates, in punishing short of what is deserved." The necessary minimum (when there is i) is set not past proportionate retribution, merely primarily by the demand to defend human life and society against those guilty of serious crimes.

It would be well worth going through this book in detail to carve up the skilful arguments, which are typically well supported by ascertainable Church teaching, from the bad ones, which are not. I may fifty-fifty get around to doing information technology myself sometime. There are really a fair number of proficient arguments in this volume, and they deserve to exist much more widely considered than information technology seems they have been in the recent by. But the book is seriously marred by the bad arguments and the pro-decease-penalisation zealotry of the authors, which is no more justifiable than the anti-death-penalty fanaticism that others present as the authentically Catholic position.

I gave the volume a "3" rating on residue, despite the serious flaws that in themselves would deserve a "1," because it actually deserves a "5" in some respects--peculiarly in thoroughness of research and presentation of many (though not all) relevant Catholic teachings.

...more

Feb 12, 2019 Etienne OMNES rated it really liked information technology

C'était la toute première défense chrétienne de la légitimité de la peine de mort, et elle est très convaincante! Edward Feser fait un fantabulous travail de philosophe et théologien, et le co-auteur Joseph Bessette donne united nations arrière plan juridique et politique très intéressant, qui ancre dans la réalité. A eux deux, ils réduisent à néant l'opposition chrétienne à la peine capitale (et une bonne partie de l'opposition séculière aussi).

Cependant, le livre est spécifiquement écrit cascade les catholique

C'était la toute première défense chrétienne de la légitimité de la peine de mort, et elle est très convaincante! Edward Feser fait un excellent travail de philosophe et théologien, et le co-auteur Joseph Bessette donne un arrière plan juridique et politique très intéressant, qui ancre dans la réalité. A eux deux, ils réduisent à néant l'opposition chrétienne à la peine capitale (et une bonne partie de fifty'opposition séculière aussi).

Cependant, le livre est spécifiquement écrit pour les catholiques, et cela lui donne parfois des faiblesses à ce qui fait sa force: united nations protestant lira avec profit le chapitre 1 et la première moitié du chapitre 2, ainsi que le chapitre 3. En revanche, les discussions de droit canonique et de politique intra-romaine sont inutiles et inintéressante pour lui (mais pas cascade un lecteur romain!). Une bonne lecture, et même indispensable pour tous ceux qui étudient le sujet!

...more than

Edward Feser is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Pasadena City College in Pasadena, California. He has been a Visiting Assistant Professor at Loyola Marymount Academy in Los Angeles and a Visiting Scholar at the Social Philosophy and Policy Center at Bowling Greenish Country University in Bowling Green, Ohio. He holds a Ph.D. in philosophy from the Academy of California at Santa Barbara, an M Edward Feser is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Pasadena City Higher in Pasadena, California. He has been a Visiting Assistant Professor at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles and a Visiting Scholar at the Social Philosophy and Policy Center at Bowling Green State University in Bowling Green, Ohio. He holds a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of California at Santa Barbara, an Yard.A. in organized religion from the Claremont Graduate School, and a B.A. in philosophy and religious studies from the California State University at Fullerton.

Called past National Review "1 of the best contemporary writers on philosophy," Feser is the author of On Nozick, Philosophy of Heed, Locke, The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism, and Aquinas, and editor of The Cambridge Companion to Hayek and Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. He is also the writer of many academic articles. His primary academic inquiry interests are in the philosophy of mind, moral and political philosophy, and the philosophy of religion.

Feser too writes on politics and culture, from a conservative point of view; and on faith, from a traditional Roman Catholic perspective. In this connection, his work has appeared in such publications as The American, The American Conservative, Metropolis Journal, The Claremont Review of Books, Crisis, Offset Things, Liberty, National Review, New Oxford Review, Public Discourse, Reason, and TCS Daily.

He lives in Los Angeles with his wife and six children.

...more

News & Interviews

Spring is finally here, thank the gods. That was a rough winter.   To celebrate the year'southward greenest season, we've gathered here the best new...

Welcome back. Just a moment while nosotros sign you in to your Goodreads business relationship.

considenoblefust.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/33776052-by-man-shall-his-blood-be-shed

Share this post